|The major proponents of a new world order, the United Nations and the World Economic Forum, have brought us chaos on an unparalleled scale. |
The United Nations insists that failure to reduce carbon emissions will result in the death of us all. It uses fraudulent memes such as ‘follow the science’ and ‘the science is settled.’ The UN ignores the principles of science:
The hypothesis of Michel Mann’s hockey stick projection on global warming has never been replicated, indicating the conclusions are false. Further, the IPCC refuses to consider many factors other than carbon emissions that
affect our climate. Science is the opposite of the three monkeys; it questions everything continuously, seeking better answers to our most vexing problems.
- Rule out rival hypotheses.
- Correlation isn’t causation.
- Falsifiability (ability to fudge results).
- Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence.
- Occam’s Razor (the simplest is
On the medical side, Dr. Neil Ferguson, who introduced the lockdowns and isolation
theory to combat COVID, turned out to have a history of wildly inaccurate predictions, and his hypothesis had never been tested anywhere. The results have been catastrophic, economically and socially. We ignore scientific principles at our peril.
Professor Klaus Schwab, the originator of the World Economic Forum, has a plan to engage the foremost political, business, cultural and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas.
That might be laudable
if the aim was to reach a democratic consensus. The objective is to indoctrinate leaders into following WEF goals. The WEF believes that progress happens by bringing together people from all walks of life who have the drive and the influence to make positive
Fifty-one years after its founding, the WEF failed to anticipate and prevent the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Professor Schwab’s bragging that the WEF has infiltrated the governments of many democracies, including Canada,
cannot be considered a positive change.
The UN and WEF are relegated to spectator status while the Ukraine crisis unfolds. Both are madly spinning events as something they deplore. That is very weak tea from organizations whose objective is to control
the world we inhabit.
At the outset of developing democracies, they existed primarily to protect us from criminals. Tribal and vigilante justice were defective, and we needed an impartial method of dealing with crimes. Initially, chieftains met
to hear allegations of wrongdoing and dispense justice on an agreed-upon scale. That led to legislative regulation of society and the development of a justice system.
Decades later, we introduced party politics offering differing ideologies who
competed for the right to govern. Over the following decades, governments became increasingly unwilling to be held accountable for their actions.
On November 10th, 2016, Danish MP Ida Auken published an essay “Welcome To 2030: I Own Nothing,
Have No Privacy And Life Has Never Been Better,” for World Economic Forum. In the essay, Auken makes predictions for the year 2030, writing that in 2030 one doesn’t own a house, a car, appliances or clothes, instead renting everything. The essay
also predicts mass surveillance and society split in two. As of 2022, the essay is no longer available on the World Economic Forum’s website. A summary of the article is here.
From the WEF website: “Ida Auken is the Former Minister for the Environment in Denmark (2011-2014). She is a member of the Danish Parliament for The Social Liberal Party and Chairman of The Parliament’s Climate and Energy Committee.
Ida Auken was the first Danish politician chosen to be a Young Global Leader for the World Economic Forum and has also been elected to be one out of the 40 most promising young leaders under 40 in Europe. She is the author of the book “Dansk” and
has written about climate, energy and circular economy for many years.”
Auken is a 43-year-old environmentalist, originally a Socialist People’s Party member. She switched to the Social Liberal Party in 2014 and the Social
Democrats in 2021. She is very involved in the WEF as a Member of the Global Future Council on the Future of Cities and Urbanization and a Member of the Europe Policy Group (since 2017).
The UN and WEF are enemies of democracy, which is based on
the invaluable rights and freedoms of the individual. They offer a triple ‘S’ threat for us – Serfdom, Socialism and Subjugation.
We must say a resounding: “NO” to plans for a Great Reset. We do not need to revert to
the rule of kings no matter what the disguise.
American economist and author Thomas Sowell put it best: “It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those
decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.”